S.J.KATHAWALLA
Rajeev Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Grentex & Company Private Limited – Respondent
1. The above Appeal is filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”). By the above Appeal, the Appellants have impugned the order passed by the Company Law Board, Mumbai Bench (“CLB”) dated 30th January 2010 dismissing Company Petition No. 112 of 2008 which was filed by the Appellants (Original Petitioners) against the Respondents on the ground of oppression of the Appellants who are the minority shareholders of Respondent No.1 Company and mismanagement of the Respondent Company.
2. The Appellants have submitted that the following important questions of law require determination by this Court.
(1) Whether in a family Company, where there are essentially two groups of shareholders, and two Directors, and when admittedly there is deadlock with regard to the conduct of the business of the Company, the CLB ought to have granted reliefs so as to put an end to the oppression and mismanagement?
(2) Whether in a family Company, where all the other Directors and Shareholders received salaries and allowances from the Company, the nonpayment of salary to one Director and nonpayment of allowances to the Shareholders, so also to the Group Company's staff working for t
Hanuman Prasad Bagri v Bagress Cereals (2001 (4) SCC 420
Sangramsiunh Gaikwad v Shantidevi Gaikwad (2005 (11) SCC 314)
Needle Industry Ltd. V Needle Industries Newway India Holding Ltd. AIR 1981 SC 1298
Chatterjee Petrochem (India) Pvt. Ltd. V Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. & ors. 2011 (10) SCC 466
S.P. Jain v Kalinga Tubes AIR 1965 SC 1535
MSDC Radharaman v MSD Chandrasekara Raja & anr. (2008) 6 SCC 750
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.