1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Rule.

3. Rule made returnable forthwith.

4. By consent, the matter is taken on board for final hearing at the stage of admission itself.

5. By this Civil Revision Application, the Defendant – Judgment Debtor challenges the order dated 15th April, 2011 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Nashik below Exhibit 1 in Special (Civil) Darkhast no.1 of 2007, rejecting the Petitioner’s Application for declaration that the recovery proceeding filed by the Respondents – original Plaintiffs be disposed off/dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or even otherwise on facts and holding that the execution proceeding filed by Respondents being maintainable and the judgment and order dated 19th October, 2006 passed by High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court is executable before District Court at Nashik.

6. A few facts of the matter are as under:

The Respondents – original Plaintiffs filed a Suit against the Petitioner – original Defendant in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Patents Court in the England. In the said Suit, the Petitioner preferred Application dated 11th May, 2006 for declaration that the High Court