Heard Shri J. E. Coelho Pereira, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri A. F. Diniz, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2, Shri V. P. Thali, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 and Shri S. Dhargalkar, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent nos. 1 and 1(a).

2. The above petition seeks to quash the judgment passed by the respondent no.1 dated 29.05.2007 whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent no.3 was allowed and order passed in Revocation Order No.4/18/TS/2006-CCP/5098 dated 10.11.2006 was set aside.

3. Briefly, the facts of the case as required for disposing of the above Writ Petition are that the petitioner raised an objection to the permissions granted by the respondent no.2 in favour of the respondent no.3 in respect of the development sought to be carried out in the property allegedly belonging to the petitioner. After issuing a show cause notice, the respondent no.2 revoked the licences issued in favour of the respondent no.3. In terms of the provisions of the City of Corporation Act, an appeal came to be preferred by the respondent no.3 before the respondent no.1 which came to be all