BHANGALE A.P., J.

1. By this application, revision applicant questioned legality, pro­priety and correctness of the impugned judg­ment and order in Petition No. E-405 of 1996 and Petition No. E-2511 /1996 delivered by learned Judge, Family Court, Nagpur on 1/10/2005 whereby present petitioner was made liable to pay maintenance @ Rs. 700/ per month to respondent No. 2 Ku Payal through respondent No. 1 Smt. Maya.

2. It is submitted on behalf of the appli­cant that he is not liable to pay maintenance to Ku Payal whose paternity was denied by him on the ground that he had no access to her mother at the relevant period as she was living at her parent’s house. Revision appli­cant, therefore, prayed for setting aside or­der of maintenance granted for girl Ku Payal, his alleged daughter. It is submitted on be­half of the revision applicant that he had married with Maya d/o Bhaiyyalal Borkar on 19/4/1980, but Maya used to reside at her father's house at Nagpur and claimed separate maintenance for herself and daugh­ter Minal by filing Misc. Cri. Application No. 37 of 1981. Prayer for grant of maintenance by respondent Maya was rejected. However, it was allowed in respect of daughter