SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 2091

SUNIL P.DESHMUKH, B.R.GAVAI
A. P. Ramtekkar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.R. GAVAI, J.:

1. The petitions are taken up for hearing by consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties.

2. The petitioners in Writ Petition Nos. 5198/2009 and 2126/2010 are the employees of the Food Corporation of India. Petitioners 4 to 7 in Writ Petition No. 1512/2004 are employees of Reserve Bank of India. They have approached this Court being aggrieved with an action of the respondents in issuing show cause notice to them, as to why their services should not be terminated on the ground that they have failed to produce the documents required for referring their caste /tribe claim to the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee.

3. The facts in brief are that, all the petitioners have been appointed on various posts prior to 25 years and above. The petitioners were appointed on the basis of their claim as belonging to Scheduled Tribe. Most of the petitioners in the above said writ petitions, claim to be belonging to Halba Scheduled Tribe; some of them belong to Thakur, Dhoba and Gowari.

4. That as per the policy prevailing at the relevant time and in view of the office memorandum issued earlier, an employee seeking appointment agains















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top