R.K.DESHPANDE
Radhakisan Ramnath Malpani – Appellant
Versus
Rajeh Dattatray Mahajan – Respondent
1. Regular Civil Suit No.83 of 1997 for eviction and possession of the open land instituted by the respondent No.1/plaintiff-landlord was decreed by the Trial Court by its judgment and order dated 28-11-2011. Regular Civil Appeal No.191 of 2012 preferred by the appellant/defendant No.2-tenant challenging the decree passed by the Trial Court, was dismissed by the learned Ad hoc District Judge, Malkapur. Hence, this second appeal by the original defendant No.2-tenant.
2. The factual position, which is not challenged during the course of arguments, needs to be stated as under:
The suit property was the open land owned by one Govind Vishnu Saoji (Mahajan). By executing the registered sale-deed dated 1-1-1943, it was transfered in the name of the appellant/defendant No.2 Radhakisan Ramnath Malpani for a fixed period of 61 years, ending on 31-12-2003. The lessor Govind Saoji died on 29-12-1968 and the property was bequeathed under his Will in favour of the adopted son Dattatray Mahajan, who allotted it to his son Rajesh Mahajan, the respondent No.1/original plaintiff, in partition on 1-11-1978.
3. The respondent No.1/plaintiff Rajesh Mahajan filed Regular Civil Suit No.83 of 19
Ashwinikumar Govardhandas Gandhi & another Vs. Gangadhar Dattatraya Gadgil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.