CHAGLA, TENDOLKAR
Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Nazir and Sons, Bombay – Respondent
FACTS :- The following question was referred to the High Court :
Whether in the circumstances of the case a penalty could have been imposed upon the assesses firm even though the Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1940 (XL (40) of 1940) came into force on 3rd December 1940 ?
The facts leading to this question will be found in the judgment of the High Court.
Chagla, C.J. :- The question that arises in this reference is whether the assessees are liable to pay a certain penalty imposed upon them by the Income-tax Officer under S. 28 of the Act.
2. The facts which led up to this reference may be briefly stated. On 16th January 1940, the Income-tax Officer issued a notice under S. 22, sub-s. (4), Income-tax Act, for production of certain accounts and documents. The assessees failed to comply with that notice. The assessment of the assessees was completed by the Income-tax Officer on 8th February 1940. In completing the assessment, a note was made by the Income-tax Officer that proceedings should be taken against the assessees under s. 28(1)(a) and (b). On 17th February 1940, pursuant to that note, a notice was issued by the Income-tax Officer under S. 28 of the Act. Now when the assessmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.