SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1950 Supreme(Bom) 20

CHAGLA, COYAJEE
Asian Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Madholal Sindhu – Respondent


Advocates:
M.P. Amin and C.K. Daphtary, Advocate-General - for Appellants. H.M. Seervai and P.N. Bhagwati - for Respondents.

Judgement

CHAGLA, C.J. - This is an appeal from an order made by Bhagwati, J., by which he gave the plaintiffs leave to withdraw the suit filed by them with liberty to file a fresh suit. The suit which the plaintiffs had filed was a representative suit and it was filed on 4th October 1949. On 5th October the plaintiffs made an ex parts application for Receiver and an order was made on that application by Tendolkar, J. On 18th October 1949, the plaintiffs solicitors wrote to the defendants solicitors that their clients had been advised to withdraw the suit and they did not propose to proceed with the same and they personally undertook to pay the costs of the notice of motion which was still pending which would be allowed to be dismissed. They further gave intimation to the defendants that they would apply on the following day for the order of withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. Accordingly an application was made by the plaintiffs attorneys for withdrawal of the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. The application was made in Chambers and it was on that application that the learned Judge made the order against which this appeal is preferred.

2. Now, a prelimin




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top