GAJENDRAGADKAR, VYAS
Vadilal Chhaganlal Soni – Appellant
Versus
Gokaldas Mansukh – Respondent
GAJENDRAGADKAR. J. :- This is an appeal by the mortgagees against the preliminary decree for redemption which has been passed by both the Courts below. The property in suit is an open plot bearing Tikka No.17, Lot No.11, measuring 34 sq. yds. It was mortgaged on 9-11-1884 for Rs.178. The agreement between the parries was that the mortgagor was to redeem the mortgage 99 years after its execution and the mortgagee was given full authority to build any structure on this plot after spending any amount he liked. The mortgagor undertook to repay this amount to the mortgagee at the time of redemption. When the suit was filed by the plaintiffs to redeem this mortgage, the mortgagee pleaded that the claim was premature; 99 years had not still passed and so the amount under the mortgage could not be said to have become due within the meaning of S.60, T.P. Act. This was the contention of the mortgagee. The Courts below have held that the two material stipulations in the mortgage amounted to a clog on the equity of redemption and so they have allowed the plaintiffs to redeem the mortgage and passed a preliminary decree in that behalf. In this appeal Mr. Patel has contended that the Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.