SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Bom) 63

KOTWAL
Sunanda w/o Gundopant Ashtekar – Appellant
Versus
Gundopant Bandopant Ashtekar – Respondent


Advocates:
H.K. Kulkarni for M.V. Paranjpe, for Applicant; R.P. Sawant, for Opponent.

Judgement

ORDER :- This is an application for revision by a wife in a suit for divorce filed by her husband. A petition for divorce was made on 20-11-1956 by the husband on the ground of desertion by the wife, and an alternative prayer for judicial separation was also made. The wife put in her appearance and filed a written statement, and the suit came up for hearing on 9-12-1957 before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kolhapur. On that day, the wife was absent, and the trial Judge proceeded to examine three witnesses on behalf of the husband and closed the case. On 11-12-1957, he passed a decree for judicial separation under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2. Consequent upon this ex parte decree the wife, the present applicant, applied on 10-1-1958 for setting aside the ex parte decree. Her application (Misc. Application No. 27 of 1958) purported to be under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. That application was rejected by the trial Court on the ground that the wife had not established sufficient cause for setting aside the ex parte decree, and that she did not appear to have contested the suit with diligence. The trial Judge was not satisfied that she








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top