S.J.VAZIFDAR, MRIDULA BHATKAR
Hi Tech India Construction – Appellant
Versus
CEO, Slum Rehabiliation Authority – Respondent
S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. :-
1. Respondent No. 1 is the Chief Executive Officer of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (hereinafter referred to as "SRA"), respondent No. 2 is the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, SRA, respondent No.3 is the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as "MHADA"), respondent No.4 is Aman (Kurla) SRA Co-operative Housing Society (Proposed), respondent No. 5 is a firm of developers M/s. Dani Builders and Developers and respondent No. 6 is the Vinoba Bhavc Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed).
2. The petitioners have challenged a show cause-notice dated 7th June, 2010. an order dated 28th September, 2010 passed by the SRA and an order dated 21st May, 2011. passed by the High Power Committee (hereinafter referred to as "HPC"). By the order dated 28th September, 2010, passed under section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 , the SRA terminated the petitioners appointment as the developer and granted respondent No.4 - Aman (Kurla) SRA Cooperative Housing Society (hereinafter referred to as "the society'1), liberty to appoint a new developer by determining
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.