SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Bom) 477

S.J.VAZIFDAR, MRIDULA BHATKAR
Hi Tech India Construction – Appellant
Versus
CEO, Slum Rehabiliation Authority – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S. J. VAZIFDAR, J. :-

1. Respondent No. 1 is the Chief Executive Officer of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (hereinafter referred to as "SRA"), respondent No. 2 is the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, SRA, respondent No.3 is the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as "MHADA"), respondent No.4 is Aman (Kurla) SRA Co-operative Housing Society (Proposed), respondent No. 5 is a firm of developers M/s. Dani Builders and Developers and respondent No. 6 is the Vinoba Bhavc Co­operative Housing Society (Proposed).

2. The petitioners have challenged a show cause-notice dated 7th June, 2010. an order dated 28th September, 2010 passed by the SRA and an order dated 21st May, 2011. passed by the High Power Committee (hereinafter referred to as "HPC"). By the order dated 28th September, 2010, passed under section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 , the SRA terminated the petitioners appointment as the developer and granted respondent No.4 - Aman (Kurla) SRA Co­operative Housing Society (hereinafter referred to as "the society'1), liberty to appoint a new developer by determining




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top