1. Heard.

2. ADMIT.

3. Heard finally by consent.

4. This revision application impugns the judgment and order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Criminal Appeal No. 110 of 2011. The applicant Meena Mohammad Mustaq Ansari was convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Corporation Court No.2, Nagpur in Regular Criminal Case No. 1936 of 2009 for the offence punishable under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of rupees two thousand in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.

5. The applicant had allegedly committed theft of gold chain from a Beauty Parlour of the complainant. During the course of investigation a part of the gold chain with pendant were recovered by the police. The property recovered by the police was handed over to the complainant on execution of a bond. It was produced before the Court during the course of recording of evidence of the complainant/ P.W.2. It appears from the record and proceedings that the said property was returned to the complainant immediately on completion of recording of her evidence.

6. The appeal filed by