T.V.NALAWADE
Madhav Premsing Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharahtra – Respondent
1. The application is filed under section 439 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna in Criminal Application No. 403/2013. In crime registered against the respondent No. 2 for offence punishable under sections 306, 354 (A) etc. of Indian Penal Code, relief of anticipatory bail is granted.
2. The crime is registered on the basis of report given by the father of the deceased. The respondent/accused is a married man and at the relevant time, he was aged about 25 years. He has no issue from the wife. Allegations are made that he was after the deceased girl and he wanted to marry with her. The deceased was aged about 17 years and even before the incident in question the deceased had disclosed to her father about such conduct of the accused. She had also informed that she had said 'no' to the offer given by the accused, but he was always after her and he was insisting her to marry with him.
3. The incident took place on 30.4.2013. At about 8.30 p.m. when the complainant was present near one shop, he learnt that near the house of one Pandit, the accused was prevented by some villagers, when he was atte
Gurcharan Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Dinesh M.N. (S.P.) Vs. State of Gujrat
Puran Vs. Rambilas and another
State of Maharashtraand Anr. Vs. Mohd. Sajid Husain Mohd. S. Husain etc.
Adri Dharan Das Vs. State of W.B.
State of U.P. through CBI Vs. Amarmani Tripathi
Union of India Vs. Hassan Ali Khan and Anr.
Central Bureau of Investigation, Hyderabad Vs. Subramani Goapalkrishnan and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.