R.G.KETKAR
Bhaskar s/o Laxmanrao Kadam – Appellant
Versus
Additional Collector – Respondent
Heard Mr M.V. Ghatge, learned Counsel for the petitioner; Mr K.M. Suryawanshi, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 & 3; Mr B.G. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for respondent no.2; Mr V.J. Dixit, learned Senior Counsel with Mr P.B. Rakhunde for respondent nos. 4 to 12 and Mr M.R. Sonawane, learned Counsel for respondents no.13 to 15, at length. Rule. The learned Counsel for the respective respondents waive service. At the request and by consent of learned Counsel for the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the judgment and order dated 17 th June, 2013, passed by the Additional Collector, Nanded, in dispute styled as an appeal preferred by him under section 35 (3-B) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 (for short Act). By that order, the Additional Collector dismissed the dispute referred by the petitioner, challenging the proceedings and the resolution passed in the special meeting dated 25th March, 2013, of Grampanchayat, Nivgha (Bazar), Taluka Hadgaon, District Nanded (for short "Panchayat"). The special m
Vishnu Ramchandra Patil Vs. Group Gram Panchayat Kharivli & Ors.
Jaenendrakumar Phoolchand Daftari Vs. Rajendra Ramsukh Mishra & Ors.
Vijay Ramchandra Katkar Vs. Group Grampanchayat, Pali & Anr.
Durgadas Ukhaji More & Ors. Vs. Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik & Ors.
Govindlal Chagganlal Patel Vs. The Agriculture Produce market Committee & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.