S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, S.B.SHUKRE
Vijay Chandraprakash Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Joint Commissioner – Respondent
Dharmadhikari, J.
1. Rule. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 waive service. Respondent Nos.5 to 8 are duly served. None appears on their behalf. By consent Rule made returnable forthwith.
2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks following reliefs:-
“(a) the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus or similar writ be issued against the respondents directing them to take action against (1) Police Inspector Nishikant V. Tungare, (2) Police Sub- Inspector Bhat (3) Police Sub-Inspector Sashikant Sawant and (4) Police Inspector Mahadeo Koli and/or
(b) the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus or similar writ be issued against the respondents directing them to submit the report to this Court as to what action they have taken against (1) Police Inspector Nishikant V. Tungare, (2) Police Sub-Inspector Bhat (3) Police Sub-Inspector Sashikant Sawant and (4) Police Inspector Mahadeo Koli;
(c) the damages be awarded to the petitioner for the mental agony, spoil of reputation and heavy monetary loss suffered by the petitioner.”
In the case of Prakash Singh & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.