K.U.CHANDIWAL
Appasaheb Narayan Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Learned Special Judge, Sangli convicted the Appellant for offence punishable under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) and 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the PC Act”) directing to undergo R.I. for one year and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rs. Two Thousand only) with default clause to suffer imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rs.200/- (Rs. Two Hundred only) respectively. Both substantive sentences was directed to run concurrently. Feeling aggrieved, present Appeal is preferred which is admitted on 21st December, 2004.
2. The appellant was a Talathi at the material time. In Dafalpur, Taluka – Jath, District – Sangli, was a public servant within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the P. C. Act. The allegations are, in order to effect mutation of the complainant Ankush Baburao Sankpal and his other brothers, sisters, after death of his father Baburao, the appellant allegedly demanded Rs.500/- (Rs. Five Hundred only) which he scale down to Rs.250/- (Rs. Two Hundred Fifty only). The matter was reported to police attached to Anti Corruption. On 1st June, 2002, the appellant while in his office demanded Rs.250/- (Rs. Two Hundr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.