Naresh H. Patil, J.

1. Appellant No.1-Sk. Juned Sk. Moti Mansuri, husband of the deceased Heena Begum was convicted for an offence punishable under sections 302 and 498A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. He was sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one year for the first offence and further sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for nine months for the second offence. Both the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. The appellant No.2-Julekha Begum w/o Sk. Moti Mansuri was convicted for an offence punishable under section 498-A read with 34 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for nine months. Both the appellants have questioned in this appeal the judgment and order dated 12-5-2011 passed by the Additional Sessions Judges-2, Aurangabad in Sessions Case No.394 of 2009.

2. In brief, the prosecution case is that deceased Heena Begum and PW-3 Raziabegum were married to two real brothe