SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Bom) 1686

ABHAY M.THIPSAY
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Shrikant Bandu Bhojne – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant: K.S. Patil, A.P.P.
For the Respondent:S.S Rathi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Oral Judgment:

1. Heard. By consent, admitted and taken up for final hearing forthwith. By consent, calling for Record and Proceedings dispensed with.

2. The respondent is the sole accused in Sessions Case No.116/2010 pending before the Sessions Court, at Parbhani. In that case, the First Information Report came to be lodged on the allegations that the respondent herein and one Suresh Shelke had committed the offences punishable under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code and 366 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code. After investigation, the Investigating Agency filed charge sheet only against the respondent alleging the commission of offences punishable under Sections 376 of Indian Penal Code and 366 of Indian Penal Code by the respondent. The charge of offences punishable under Sections 376 of Indian Penal Code and 366 of Indian Penal Code was framed on 20.4.2011 and the case was kept for recording of evidence. After the evidence of the victim – the first witness for prosecution was recorded, the prosecution filed an application before the Trial Court requesting the Court to frame an additional charge in the matter. The Court, however, comple















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top