S.J.KATHAWALLA
Disha Construction – Appellant
Versus
SJaysen S. Mastakar – Respondent
1. The above Suit is filed by the Plaintiff for (i) a declaration that the Suit Contract (Exhibits O, U and II to the Plaint) is valid, subsisting and binding upon the Defendants;
(ii) a mandatory order and injunction directing Defendant Nos. 1 to 28 to comply with the Suit Contract (Exhibits O, U and II to the Plaint); (iii) an order directing Defendant Nos. 1 to 27 to sign and execute the Tripartite Agreements in terms of Clause 4 of the Second Supplemental Agreement (Exhibit-II to the Plaint); (iv) a mandatory order and injunction directing Defendant Nos. 1 to 28 to forthwith hand over quiet, vacant and peaceful possession of the property more particularly described in Exhibit-A to the Plaint, for the purpose of carrying out redevelopment thereof in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Suit Contract (Exhibits O, U and II to the Plaint); (v) a perpetual order and injunction restraining Defendant Nos. 1 to 28 from, in any manner selling, transferring, alienating, dealing with, disposing off and/or creating third party rights and/or encumbrances in respect of the property described in Exhibit-A to the Plaint; and
(vi) to order and decree Defendant Nos. 1 to 27 t
Margaret Almeida Vs. Bombay Catholic Co-operative Housing Soc. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.