V.K.TAHILRAMANI, A.R.JOSHI
Shashikant Tulsidas Kamble – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
A.R. Joshi, J.
1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Arfan Sait, appointed under the Free Legal Aid Scheme for both the appellants/orig. accused persons. Also heard learned APP for the State Mrs. Deshmukh. Perused the R & P and also perused the substantive evidence of total 40 prosecution witnesses examined before the trial Court.
2. Present Criminal Appeal is preferred through jail by the appellants / orig. accused Nos.1 & 2 challenging the judgment and order of conviction dated 30th October, 2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jaysingpur, District – Kolhapur in Sessions Case No.1 of 2006.
3. By the impugned judgment and order both the accused were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 364A of IPC and were sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1000/- each. They were also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 384 read with Section 34 of IPC and were sentenced to suffer RI for three years and fine of Rs.1000/- each, and in default to further undergo RI for one month. They were also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 387 read with Section 34 of IPC and were sentenced to suffer RI for five years and to pay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.