SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 2179

ANOOP V.MOHTA
Ravindra Narottamdas Merchant – Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Narottamdas Marchant – Respondent


JUDGMENT :-

1. Heard by consent of the parties finally.

2. Both the counsel made their respective submissions and the matter was closed for orders on 31.08.2012. The parties were directed to file written notes of arguments. However, as noted and as there was no arguments made with regard to the Chamber Summons and the Notices of Motions referred in last paragraph of order dated 5 August 2005, the matters were listed for clarification on this part; and for supply of copies; and for re-hearing as those matters were not part of the main hearing. On 5 October, 2012 the 3nms 201-12. time was sought to file the same and it was accordingly extended. The Office was also directed to place all these Notices of Motions and the chamber summon along with the main matter on 10.10.2012. The time was sought again and accordingly the matter was adjourned for 19.10.2012 for re-hearing.

3. The parties filed the additional compilations of documents. The parties were also directed to file a short synopsis and written notes of arguments revolving around these disposed of Notice of Motions and the chamber summons. On 29.10.2012, re-heard both the learned senior counsel appearing for the parties. No specif













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top