MOHIT S.SHAH, ANOOP V.MOHTA
Nahur Vivekanand Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Rule, Respective counsel waive service of Rule.
2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing forthwith.
3. Petitioner No.1 is a Cooperative Housing Society of occupants of buildings which were constructed by Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA). MHADA has permitted the Petitioner No.1-society to redevelop the property under Regulation 33(5) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, 1991. Petitioner No.2 is the developer which has been given the development rights on the above land in Nahur, Mulund (West), Mumbai. The land admeasures 6164 square meters as per the property card.
4. By now, all the eight buildings which were constructed by MHADA have been demolished and 160 members of Petitioner No.1-Society have been shifted to transit accommodation or have been provided compensation by way of fixed rental amount to enable the members to take rented premises on their own as a temporary arrangement till new buildings are constructed by Petitioner No.2-developer. So far the Petitioners have applied for and have been granted building permission for rehabilitation buildings and free sale buildin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.