IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Arvind Bakelal Verma
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
Criminal Appeal No. 1402 of 2011 with Criminal Application No. 365 of 2013
Decided on: 10th May, 2013
Appellate Court, while reversing order of conviction, has to record against each witness as to why such witness is not believed by it when he was believed by trial Court.
[Indian] Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 120-B, 489-B and 489-C - Conviction for possession and use of - Counterfeit currency notes.
Where accused persons came together and handed over parcels of counterfeit notes to each other indicating their agreement to do an illegal act therefore conviction of accused persons under Sections 120-B, 489-B and 489-C of Code proper.
INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - Sections 489-A, 489-B, 489-C and 489-D - Offence of counterfeiting currency notes.
Accused having been involved in each of these acts, must be proved by prosecution beyond all reasonable doubt.
INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 - Sections 489-A and 489-D - Conviction for counterfeiting currency notes.
Where there was no reference in deposition of witnesses as to accused making or possessing instruments for counterfeiting currency notes therefore finding of guilt of accused recorded by trial Court is perverse.
1. This is an Appeal by the Original Accused No.1 in Sessions Case No.455 of 2007.
2. The Original Accused No.11 Appellant before me is aggrieved and dissatisfied with the Judgment and Order of conviction passed by the 5th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai dated 8th August, 2008.
3. By this Judgment and Order, the Appellant/Original Accused No.1 is convicted of the offence punishable under Section 489-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.20,000/-. In default, he has to undergo simple imprisonment for three years.
4. The operative order reads as follows :
"01) Accused No.1 Arvind Bakelal Verma is hereby convicted as per section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offence punishable under section 489-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.1. for Ten (10) years and to pay fine of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) and in default of payment of fine to suffer S.1. for three (3) years.
02) Accused No.1 Arvind Bakelal Verma is hereby convicted as per section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offence punishable under section 489-D of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for Ten (10) years and to pay fine of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) and in default of payment of fine to suffer S.I. for three (3) years.
03) Accused No.1 Arvind Bakelal Verma, accused no.2 Akhilesh Bramhadev Tiwari and accused no.03 Ramvilas Ramdhari Chauhan, are hereby convicted as per section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offence punishable under section 489-B of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for Seven (7) years by each accused and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) by each accused and in default of payment of fine to suffer S.I. for two (2) years, by each accused.
04) Accused No.1 Arvind Bakelal Verma, accused no.2 Akhilesh Bramhadev Tiwari and accused no.3 Ramvilas Ramdhari Chauhan, are hereby convicted as per section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offence punishable under section 489-C of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for Five (5) years by each accused and to pay fine of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) by each accused and in default of payment of fine to suffer S.I. for three (3) years, by each accused.
05) Accused No.1 Arvind Bakelal Verma, accused no.2 Akhilesh Bramhadev Tiwari and accused no.03 Ramvilas Ramdhari Chauhan are hereby convicted as per section 235(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offence punishable under section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for one (1) year by each accused and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand only) and in default of payment of fine to suffer S.I. for three (3) months, by each accused."
5. The order further directs that Accused No.2-Akhilesh Bramhadev Tiwari and Accused No.3-Ramvilas Ramdhari Chauhan are acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 489-A and 489-D of the Indian Penal Code.
6. The Prosecution case is that on 1st March, 2007, at about 20:10 hours, Police Inspector Giri called Police Sub Inspector Jamil Shaikh and the Police Constables and informed them that reliable information has been received that three persons are coming near the entrance of Infinity Mall. Therefore, a trap has to be laid at that place and further action needs to be taken.
7. Thereafter, as per the orders of the Police Inspector Giri, two Panchas were summoned in his chamber. They were also informed about the information received. Thereafter, the relevant and necessary entries were made in the Station Diary and the team proceeded towards Infinity Mall, Oshiwara, Andheri (West), Mumbai. Thereafter, a trap was laid at the entrance of the said Mall. At about 20:40 hours, two persons came near the glass entrance door. The team was alerted and thereafter one more person came there at about 20:45 hours. There was some discussion betw
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.