S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, G.S.PATEL
Rajesh Himatlal Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
1. Since both matters involve common issues, they are being decided by this common order. For properly appreciating the arguments of parties, the facts in Criminal Application No.700/2011 are referred to.
2. There was a order to dispose of these Petitions finally and hence we have heard counsel accordingly. Hence, RULE. The Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith.
3. The Criminal Application No.700/2011 invokes jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to quash the First Information Report dated 08.07.2011 registered with Dahisar Police Station being C.R. No.220/2011 alleging offences of cheating and forgery punishable under Sections 420, 464, 465, 467 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. The Respondent No.2 (original Complainant) has in his statement alleged that he is residing in Thane district and at the address particularly mentioned by him. He states that he belongs to Adiwasi Warli Community. He made a complaint in writing against the builders Rajesh Himatlal Shah and Mukesh Himatlal Shah. The Complaint is that Rajesh Shah and Mukesh Shah are Managing Directors/ Partners of one M/s Nahalchand Laloo
AIR 1963 SC 1577 (G.S.Bansal Versus The Delhi Administration)
Dr.Vimla Versus The Delhi Administration reported in AIR 1963 SC 1572
AIR 1996 SC 722 (State of Maharashtra v/sIshwar Piraji Kalpatri)
AIR 1996 SC 2982 (Mushtaq Ahmad Versus Mohd. Habibur Rehman Faizi)
Inder Mohan Goswami and another Versus State of Uttaranchal and others reported in (2007) 12 SCC 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.