NARESH H.PATIL, F.M.REIS
Brigida de Souza Alias Brigida Miranda – Appellant
Versus
Julino De Souza – Respondent
F.M. Reis, J.
Heard Shri Lobo, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant and Shri Lotlikar, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent.
2. The above Appeal challenges an Order and Decree dated 14.12.2004, whereby Matrimonial Petition filed by the Appellants came to be dismissed as no cause of action survived for the Appellants.
3. Briefly, the facts of the case as stated by the Appellant is that she got married to the Respondent on 05.01.1994 and after her marriage was registered at the Civil Registration Office at Ilhas, Panaji, the Respondent forced the Appellant to leave her job stating that he was worth over crores of Rupees. The religious marriage took place on 14.05.1994 at the Church of Immaculate Conception at Panaji and after the marriage, both started residing at the ancestral house of the Respondent at Grant Road at Mumbai. Thereafter, they shifted to their own flat at Mahim in Mumbai. It is the contention of the Appellant that the Respondent started harassing the Appellant and abused the Appellant by using filthy words. A child was born out of the marriage on 14.12.1995 and thereafter another child came to be born on 09.09.1996. It is further contended b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.