IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
F.M. REIS, J.
Camilo Pereira
Versus
Government of Goa & Another
FIRST APPEAL NO.109 OF 2006 & FIRST APPEAL NO.233 OF 2006
Decided On : 05-05-2011
Land Acquisition - Compensation - Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 4, Section 11, Section 18 - The judgment discusses the fixing of compensation for acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court considered the market value of the land, the purpose of the land acquisition, and the evidence presented to determine the appropriate compensation rate. The court modified the compensation to Rs.85/- per square metre.
Fact of the Case:
The land was acquired for road construction under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer offered compensation at Rs.11.50 per square metre. The Reference Court partly allowed the reference and fixed the compensation at Rs.41/- per square metre. Both the applicant and respondents appealed the judgment.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the evidence presented, including sale instances and expert valuation, to determine the market value of the acquired land. It found that the price offered in the sale deed for access to the applicant's property could not be considered the market value. The court modified the compensation to Rs.85/- per square metre.
Issues: The main issue was whether the Reference Court was justified in fixing the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs.41/- per square metre.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the purpose of the land acquisition, the market value of the land, and the evidence presented to determine the appropriate compensation rate. It found that the price offered in the sale deed for access to the applicant's property could not be considered the market value. The court modified the compensation to Rs.85/- per square metre.
Final Decision: The court partly allowed the applicant's appeal and modified the compensation for the acquired land to Rs.85/- per square metre. The remaining part of the award granting statutory benefits was confirmed. The respondents' appeal was dismissed.
Both the above appeals are taken together for final hearing as they challenge the same judgment and award passed in Land Acquisition Case No.12/2000 dated 29/11/2005.
2. The parties shall be referred to in the manner they so appear in the cause title of the impugned judgment.
3. Pursuant to a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, hereinafter referred to as "the said Act" dated 24/04/1992, land was acquired from Betalbatim in Salcete Taluka for construction of road from Nagwaddo, Humpto via Cemetery, Bhimwado and from Ranwado Chapel to Betalbatim main road in Village Panchayat of Betalbatim main road and amongst the land which was acquired a portion of the property under Survey No.1/1 situated at Consua Village admeasuring an area of 400 square metres, was also acquired. By an award passed under Section 11 of the said Act dated 6/09/1994, the Land Acquisition Officer offered the compensation of a sum of Rs.11.50 per square metre for the land acquired.
4. Being dissatisfied with the said amount the applicant sought a reference under Section 18 of the said Act and claimed a compensation at the rate of Rs.300/-per square metre for the land acquired. By judgment and award dated 29/11/2005, the learned Reference Court partly allowed the said reference and fixed the compensation at the rate of Rs.41/- per square metre. Being aggrieved by the said judgment, the applicant as well as the respondents have preferred the present appeal.
5. Ms. S. Linhares, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents has assailed the impugned judgment and pointed out that the land acquired was a narrow strip of land which was used for the road by the applicant and, as such, the question of fixing the compensation on the basis of sale instance as sought to be done by the Reference Court while awarding a sum of Rs.41/- per square metre is totally erroneous. The learned Counsel has taken me through the evidence on record and pointed out that the land acquired had no potentiality of being used for any other purpose as admittedly the land was purchased by the applicant for the purpose of providing access to his property. The learned Counsel has further pointed out that the Reference Court has erroneously enhanced the compensation offered by the Land Acquisition Officer as according to her the amount offered in the award under Section 11 of the said Act was just and appropriate. The learned Counsel further submitted that it is not the case of the applicant that in view of the acquisition of the land, the property of the applicant has become land locked and, as such, the question of alleging that the compensation be fixed at the rate of Rs.125/-per square metre on the basis of the sale instance produced by the applicant does not arise at all. The learned Counsel has taken me through the impugned judgment and pointed out that the Reference Court has totally misdirected itself in enhancing the compensation and, as such, the appeal preferred by the respondents deserves to be allowed and the impugned judgment be quashed and set aside.
6. On the other hand, Shri M.P. Almeida, the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant has submitted that the amount awarded by the Reference Court at the rate of Rs.41/- per square metre is on the lower side. The learned Counsel has further submitted that it is well settled that the price at which the land acquired has been purchased by the land owner should be the amount of compensation to be awarded for acquiring such land and, as such, the question of the Reference Court effecting any deductions on the amount of the price fixed in the sale instance produced by the applicant at the rate of Rs.125/- per square metre does not arise. The learned Counsel has further pointed out that the applicant is entitled for the compensation on the basis of the said sale instance in respect of the very land acquired after giving necessary appreciation for the period between the date
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.