N.A.BRITTO
Rafael Fernandes – Appellant
Versus
Terezinha Rodrigues – Respondent
N.A. Britto. J.
Rule. By consent, rule is heard forthwith.
2. The petitioners are the judgment debtors in execution proceedings bearing No. 29/1994, arising from RCS No. 293/1991/D, and are admittedly the mundkars of the respondents. In this petition, the petitioners, (JDs for short), challenged the orders dated 29.9.2005 and 13.4.2006 of the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division. Margao, in the said Execution Proceedings. In fact it has been submitted on behalf of the respondent (OHs for short) that the JDs did not challenge the first order dated 29.9.2005. by which the learned executing Court d had ordered a Commissioner to be appointed to demarcate the area of the house admeasuring 120 square metres and cowshed of 23 square metres and only when by subsequent and consequential order was made appointing Shri Moniz, a Civil Engineer as a Commissioner, that this petition has been preferred by the JDs. Some bare facts are required to be stated to dispose of this petition.
3. By order dated 31. 10.1988. the JDs were declared the mundkars of their dwelling house bearing No. 1155, situated in survey No. 19/1 of Village Curtorim, to the extent of 143 square metres in area i.e. 120 sq
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.