N.A.BRITTO
Vimal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
N.A. Britto, J.-These appeals are filed by the accused who have been convicted and sentenced under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, ('Act' for short), by Judgment/Order dated 7.7.2004 of the Special Judge, Mapusa, Goa. The said accused were prosecuted after a complaint was filed by Shri Vaz, Superintendent of Customs and Central Excise/PW 4, with the allegation that on 23.2.2001, at about 18.30 hours, both of them while travelling on a motorcycle from Margao towards Panaji, were found in possession of 8.5 kgs hashish valued at about Rs. 20,00,000. In the course of the trial, the complainant examined himself/PW 4 and five more witnesses.
2. The case of the accused was that they were falsely implicated. As per A-1/Satyawan Pagi, in his statement separately filed after recording his statement under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, A-1/Satyawan Pagi, was in the precincts of the Margao bus stand, when some persons grabbed him, put him in a jeep and took him to a building in Margao, where he was questioned for hours and was threatened and assaulted and forced to put his signature on various documents. A-1/Satyawan Page
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.