SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Bom) 2513

MRIDULA BHATKAR
Anil Kondiba Satoshe – Appellant
Versus
Nanda Anil Satoshe – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant:B.G. Yewale, Advocate.
For the Respondent:G.M. Salunkhe, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Admit. Notice made returnable forthwith. By consent, the appeal is heard finally at the stage of admission.

2. This Appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 27th April, 2012 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane in a Marriage Petition No. 382 of 2010 filed for restitution of conjugal right.

3. The appellant/husband and respondent/wife got married on 16th May, 2008 and they both started residing together at the residence of the appellant. On 25th September, 2009 a girl child named Durga was born out of this wedlock. The respondent went to her maiden home for delivery, but she did not come back thereafter and the appellant and his mother brought five months old baby back to their house. It is the case of the appellant that though the appellant requested the respondent to come and stay with him and lead a matrimonial life, she was always reluctant. It is the contention of the appellant that the respondent used to fight on petty issues and also to shirk from doing domestic work, because of which his mother had to take the responsibility of the entire domestic work. It is the case of the appellant that the respondent was not ready to reside with him along wit










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top