1. The application is filed for permission to intervene in the proceeding filed for relief of anticipatory bail. The learned counsel Shri. Jeevan Patil appointed by the original complainant wants to even address the Court to oppose the application. This Court had expressed that he can assist the learned A.P.P. and he can file documents and written arguments.

2. This Court, the undersigned, has held in Criminal Application No. 2458/2011 (from Aurangabad Bench) [Annasaheb Vs. Dr. Patil] that such counsel cannot be allowed to address the Court and at the most, he can assist the learned Public Prosecutor/Assistant Public Prosecutor appointed by the State and who is in-charge of the case. It is also held by this Court that the original complainant can file written arguments and this is possible both in a proceeding filed for bail and anticipatory bail. In the case reported as 2009 ALL M.R. 687 (Vinay Poddar Vs. State) one Hon'ble Judge of this Court has held that in a proceeding filed for relief of anticipatory bail, the victim/original complainant has right to intervene, right to address the Court to oppose the application. However, in this reported case, the Hon'ble Single Jud