R.M. Borde, J.

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties.

2. The petitioner, who is a retired employee of Respondent No.7-Institution, is seeking enforcement of the decision passed by the Grievance Committee on 20.08.2010, which has been approved by the Management Council vide its decision dated 16.03.2011, as communicated vide letter dated 7th April, 2011, issued by the Registrar of the University.

3. The Grievance Committee has issued direction to the Management to consider services rendered by the petitioner from 03.07.1972 to 01.07.1977 as full time service; and it has further directed to submit necessary proposal to the concerned authority. The decision taken by the Grievance Committee was placed before the Management Council of the University and said decision came to be approved on 16.03.2011.

4. The petitioner makes a grievance that Respondent-Institution has not acted in pursuance to the decision rendered by the Grievance Committee and that the proposal for extending monetary benefits in pursuance to the decision of the Grievance Committee has not been forwarded to the Joint Director, Higher E