In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.
Ramu Shankar Wagh
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Criminal Revision Application No. 10 of 2007
Decided On : 11-02-2014
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 306 and 498-A - Evidence Act, 1872, Section 113-A - Conviction for cruelty and abetment of decide. - Failure of prosecution to prove both alleged charges levelled against accused beyond all reasonable doubt entitled accused to be acquitted. - The cruelty aspect has not been established by the prosecution beyond all reasonable doubts. Once the prosecution has failed to establish allegations of cruelty, the presumption under Section 113-A of the Indian Evidence Act could not have been drawn in favour of the prosecution. In that situation, it is for the prosecution to establish on the basis of other evidence that the applicant had intentionally aided, by any act or illegal omission, the abetment of commission of suicide by the deceased. There is no evidence to establish any act or omission on the part of the applicant, which might have instigated the deceased to commit suicide. As such charge under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code fails miserably. As far as charge under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code is concerned, it is now obvious that the said charge also fails. In this regard, it may be additionally noted that the statement made by the deceased to her father, mother and uncle few days or few months before her death could not be admissible in evidence under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act as far as charge under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code is concerned as the cause of death of the deceased was not in question for the said charge. As such there is no evidence at all to establish the charge under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code. Both the charges fail miserably. Both the judgments and orders of the Courts below will have to be set aside and the applicant will have to be acquitted.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 498-A - Evidence Act, 1872, Section 32(1) - Statement of deceased prior to death. - Statement made by deceased to her parents and relatives few days before her death, not admissible under Section 32(1) of Act.
1. The applicant has been convicted by the learned Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. In all there were three accused including the applicant. The applicant was accused No.1 in the Sessions Trial No.409/2002. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 were brothers of the applicant. All the accused were chargesheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 306, 498A and 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 have been acquitted of all the charges framed against them. Accused No.1/applicant has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code and is convicted of the offences punishable under Sections 306 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that deceased Swati was married to the applicant on 26-5-2001. The applicant and his brothers were staying at Village Chande Mangali in Tahsil-Mouda, District-Nagpur. The applicant was in a private service at Mouda. He, therefore, along with the deceased was staying separately from his other family members in a rented room at Mouda. It is alleged that the applicant and other accused had been demanding Rs.2,000/- to Rs.3,000/- from the deceased and asking her to bring the amount from her parents for getting a LPG connection. This demand was continuously being made. Due to continuous harassment on the part of the applicant and other accused, the deceased had allegedly committed suicide by hanging herself on 26th March, 2002. It is also alleged that the deceased was being asked to work in the agricultural field after finishing her domestic work. The applicant used to harass the deceased as she was unable to work in the agricultural field.
3. The complaint in respect of the present offences was lodged by father of the deceased. During the course of investigation, dead body was sent to the Medical Officer for Post-Mortem Examination. The Medical Officer had opined that the deceased had died due to hanging. A ligature mark was found around neck above the level of thyroid cartilage running obliquely upwards and backwards. The length of ligature mark was 13 cm. and its breadth was 4.5 cm. Statements of the witnesses were recorded. The complainant Mahadeo, his brother Raghunath and mother of the deceased by name Kusum had stated before the police that the deceased was subjected to cruelty and that there was a demand on the part of the applicant of Rs.2,000/- to Rs.3,000/- for getting a LPG connection. It is also stated by these witnesses that P.W.1-Mahadeo and P.W.6-Kusum had gone to the house of the deceased after the marriage on 7th September, 2001 and that Kusum had stayed with her daughter upto 10th September, 2001. During that period also the deceased had stated to her mother that she was being subjected to cruelty by the applicant and other accused.
4. The case of prosecution is mainly based on the evidence of P.W.1-Mahadeo, P.W.4-Raghunath and P.W.6-Kusum. As far as cause of death is concerned, it is not disputed. It is, therefore, not necessary to discuss the evidence of the Medical Officer in respect of Post-Mortem Report and Police Officer in respect of the Inquest Report. It is also not necessary to discuss the evidence in respect of spot panchanama. The only issue, which needs to be examined in this case, is as to whether the prosecution had been able to establish that the applicant had subjected the deceased to cruelty. In this regard, it may be noted here that all the witnesses have highlighted the incident of demand of Rs.2,000/- to Rs.3,000/- for getting a LPG connection. There was some general allegations also. However, as far as specific incident is concerned, the only incident narrated by the witnesses is in respect of the said demand of Rs.2,000/- to Rs.3,000/- for getting a LPG connection.
5. Learned Counsel Shri R.M. Daga has submitted that the evidence is short of proving the charge of demand of dowry.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.