SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 402

M.L.TAHALIYANI
Vipin – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants: P.V. Bhoyar, Addl. P.P.
For the Respondents:S.R. Ashar, Advocate.

Judgment

1. Heard learned Senior Counsel Shri Anil Mardikar for the applicants, learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri P.V. Bhoyar for non-applicant No.1/State and learned Counsel Ms. S.R. Ashar for non-applicant No.2.

2. Admit. Heard finally by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

3. The applicants are accused in Criminal Complaint Case No.4 of 2007 in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur and are facing trial for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504 and 506 Part-II of the Indian Penal Code. Applicant No.2 is wife of applicant No.1. Applicant No.1 is a Priest in New Life Christian Church and is a practising lawyer. Non-applicant No.2 Nisha Choudhary is the complainant in the said criminal case. The aggrieved party mainly appears to be the brother of the complainant namely Shekhar Manikrao Choudhary. The complainant/non-applicant No.2 filed criminal complaint before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate alleging that the applicants had committed offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504 and 506 Part-II of the Indian Penal Code, inasmuch as Shekhar was prevented from visiting the Church and he was assaulted. Sh









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top