Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.

1. Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.

2. Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for final disposal.

3. We have heard the rival parties at length on 05/02/2014. In view of the earlier orders passed and the directions that we propose to give by this order, we do not find it necessary to advert to all the contentions put forth by the rival parties. We intend to consider those contentions which we find are relevant and therefore germane to the nature of the order that we propose to pass.

4. The petitioner had earlier filed Writ Petition No.8312/2011 which was decided by this Court on 10.01.2012. Thereafter, a review petition No.221/2012 was preferred by the AICTE which was heard and decided by this Court on 10.01.2013. AICTE was directed by this Court to issue letter of approval to the Petitioner College.

5. Writ Petition No.10741/2012 was filed by the petitioner which came to be decided by a judgment of this Court dated 30/04/2013. By the said judgment, certain contentious issues were noted by this Court in paragraph Nos.20 to 28. For clarity, it is necessary to reproduce the said paragraph Nos.20 to 2