T.V.NALAWADE
Krishna Gudi – Appellant
Versus
21st Century Firms, Through its Partner, Narsinha Bhalchandra Naik – Respondent
1. Revision is admitted. By consent, notice after admission made returnable forthwith. Heard both the sides. The revision is filed against the judgment and order of Criminal Appeal No 71/2011 which was pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Latur. The learned Additional Sessions Judge has confirmed the judgment and order of S.T.C.C. No. 796 of 2009 which was pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class. The J.M.F.C. has convicted and sentenced the petitioner/accused for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act ('N.I. Act' for short). Though the simple imprisonment of six months is given, this sentence is to run concurrently with similar sentence given in S.T.C.C. No. 795 of 2009. The private complaint was filed by present respondent for offence punishable under section 138 of N.I. Act.
2. In short, the facts leading to the institution of revision can be stated as follows:-
The respondent/complainant is a partnership concern and it is doing the business of printing stationary items. The petitioner/accused is in the business of stationary items. It is the case of complainant that towards the charges of printing and supply o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.