In the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad
R.M. BORDE & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.
Prashant & Others
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Tribal Development Department & Others
Writ Petition No. 4202 of 2012
Decided on: 21-01-2014
Higher Pay Scale - Class IV Employees of Aided Ashram Schools - Government Resolutions dated 18th September, 2000, 8th June, 1995, 27th March, 2000 - The court discussed the applicability of higher pay scale to Class IV employees of aided Ashram Schools in light of various government resolutions and previous court judgments.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, Class IV employees of aided Ashram Schools, sought directions for higher pay scale and consequential benefits after 12 years of service. The respondents objected, citing government resolutions and lack of provision for such benefits for Class IV employees of aided Ashram Schools.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the government had extended benefits of higher pay scale to employees of various departments but excluded Class IV employees of aided Ashram Schools, which was held to be a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Issues: The issues revolved around the applicability of higher pay scale to Class IV employees of aided Ashram Schools, the interpretation of government resolutions, and the violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the exclusion of Class IV employees of aided Ashram Schools from the benefits of higher pay scale, despite similar work and qualifications, violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Final Decision: The court directed the State to extend the benefit of higher pay scale to Class IV employees of Private Ashram Schools receiving 100% grant after completion of 12 years of qualifying service, with financial benefits to be provided within 9 months.
N.W. Sambre, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with consent of learned Counsel appearing on behalf of respective parties.
2. In the present petition the petitioners Class IV / Group ‘D’ employees of aided Ashram School, have prayed for directions to the respondent to grant them higher pay scale after completion of 12 years of service from the date of their initial appointment and to grant all consequential benefits that might have accrued to them. The petitioners have prayed for consideration of above referred claim in the light of Government Resolutions dated 18th September, 2000, 8th June, 1995 and 27th March, 2000.
3. It is the claim of the petitioners that they were appointed sometime in between 1988 to 1997, on the Class-IV posts in various Primary Ashram Schools. It is further submitted by the petitioners that their appointments are approved by the competent authority i.e. respondent No. 3 - Project Officer under the Tribal Development Department. The petitioners further claim that, the schools where they are working are receiving 100% grant-in-aid.
4. It is the claim of the petitioners in the petition that the Tribal Development Department has not provided for any accelerated promotion or placement in the higher scale upon completing qualifying service of 12 years to the petitioners. According to the petitioners, the State Government in the Department of General Administration, School Education and the Social Welfare Department have initiated the schemes so as to avoid the stagnation on the same post in the service of, giving accelerated promotion/placement in the higher pay scale upon completion of qualifying service of 12 years. The said benefit of time bound promotion is provided to all the employees except the petitioners who are Group ‘D’ employees of the Private Ashram Schools receiving 100% grant.
5. The petitioners have placed reliance on the Government decision dated 2nd September, 1989 issued by the Department of Education, wherein the Government had an occasion to consider the issue about placing the employees of Department of School Education i.e. Primary Schools, Secondary Schools, Higher Secondary Schools B.Ed. Colleges and M.C.V.C. Courses run by the Secondary Colleges, in specific pay scales. By the said resolution, the Department of Education has reiterated about the earlier scheme dated 12th August, 1987 whereby the higher pay scale and selection grade are made applicable to the teaching and non-teaching employees of the Department of School Education based on the recommendations of the Central Government. (Prof. Chatopadhyaya Committee Recommendations).
6. The Counsel for petitioners further brought to the notice of this Court that the Central Government based upon the recommendations made by the National Commission for teachers headed by Professor - D. P. Chattopadhyaya, has issued certain recommendations by communication dated 12th August, 1987. The said recommendations were implemented by the Central Government by conferring selection grade and senior scale to teachers. So as to benefit the employees of the State Government in view of the above referred recommendations of Chattopadhyaya Committee, the State Government has also taken decision to apply corrected pay scales to the teaching and non-teaching employees of aided - Primary Schools, Secondary Schools, Higher Secondary Schools, Technical schools and D.Ed. Colleges.
7. The petitioners have further placed reliance on the Government decision dated 27th March, 2000 so as to demonstrate that the benefits of the recommendation of 5th Pay Commission are extended to the teaching and non-teaching employees of Primary, Secondary Ashram Schools.
8. The petitioners have further brought to the notice of this Court that the Department of Education has issued Government Resolution dated 13th May, 1999 and 6th September, 1999 whereby the Department of Education has extended corrected pay scales to the teaching and non-teachi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.