R.D.DHANUKA
Ketankumar Manganlal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Dahiben Vasantkumar Patel – Respondent
1. By this Chamber Summons, applicants seek condonation of delay of 140 days in filing caveat and affidavit in support of caveat. This Chamber Summons is opposed by the original petitioner by filing a detailed affidavit in reply. There is no rejoinder filed by the applicants. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this Chamber Summons are as under:-
2. On 22.4.2013 citations were received by the caveators at Canada. On 15/25.6.2013, Mrs. Dahiben Vasantkumar Patel who is one of the applicant and was served with citation executed a power of attorney in favour of Mr. Suchindra Bhawarlal Soni. Based on such power of attorney, on 4.7.2013, the said constituted attorney filed caveat in this court on behalf of all the applicants.
3. On 4.7.2013, applicants filed Chamber Summons (59 of 2013) in Petition No. 466 of 2010 inter alia praying for condonation of delay of 40 days in filing caveat. While opposing the said Chamber Summons No. 59 of 2013, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner strongly raised an objection regarding the power of attorney dated 15/25.6.2013 on the ground that the same was given only by Mrs. Dahiben Vasantkumar Patel one of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.