Ashok Gangadhar Shedge vs Ramesh Gangadhar Shedge

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1104

R.G.KETKAR
Ashok Gangadhar Shedge – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Gangadhar Shedge – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. G.S.Godbole i/b Mr. Drupad S. Patil, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr.P.B.Shah i/b Kayval P. shah for Respondent Nos 1A to 1C and 2.
Mr. Pramod G. Kathane, Advocate for Respondent nos 4 to 6.
Mr. Vaibhav P. Patankar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr S.P.Golekar i/b Mr. T.D.Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Mr.P.P.Kulkarni, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr N.J.Patil, Advocate for respondent nos 1 and 9.
Mr G.N.Salunke a/w Mr. N.B.Khaire, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr. Mahesh Rawool i/b Mr K.P.Shah, Advocate for the Appellants.
Ms Neha Valsangkar, Advocate for respondent nos 1 to 3.
Mr Manoj Saverdekar i/b Mr P.G.Kuthane, Advocate for Respondent nos 4 to 6.
Mr R.S.Apte, Senior Advocate i/b Mr Vaibhav P. Patankar, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr G.S.Godbole a/w Mr Parshant P More a/w Mr Pratap M. Nimbalkar, Advocate for Respondent nos 1 to 3.
Mr. M.M.Mahajan, Advocate for respondent nos 4,5 and 6.
Mr.V.S.Talkute with Mr S.R.Moray, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr Pankaj Shinde, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. A.V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. S.B.Deshmukh, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr. G.M.Joshi, Advocate for Respondent nos 1, 4, 5 and 6.
Mr Vithaldas Shankar Bhandari, Respondent no.3 in-person.
Mr Drupad S. Patil, Advocate for respondent no.7A to 7E.
Mr. Sandeep S. Salunkhe, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr Abhijit Kulkarni a/w Mr Manoj Badgujar, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr Ravindra Pachundkar h/f Mr Dilip Bodake, Advocate for Respondent no.1,2A to 2D , 3 and 4.
Mr. P.J.Pawar, Advocate for the Appellants.
Mr V.S.Tadke i/b Mr. Y.G.Thorat, Advocate for Respondent no.3.

ORDER:

1. Heard Mr. A.V.Anturkar, Mr. R.S.Apte, learned senior counsel, Mr. G.S.Godbole, Mr. Vaibhav Patankar, Mr. P.P.Kulkarni, Mr. G.N.Salunkhe, Mr. V.S.Talkute, Mr. Sandeep Salunkhe, Mr. Abhijit Kulkarni, learned counsel for the appellants in all Appeals and Mr. P.B.Shah, Mr. Pramod Kathane, Mr. T.D.Deshmukh, Mr. N.J.Patil, Mr. N.B.Khaire, Mr. Pratap M. Nimbalkar, Mr. M.M.Mahajan, Mr. Pankaj Shinde, Mr. G.M.Joshi, Mr. Ravindra Pachundkar, Mr. S.C.Wakankar, learned counsel for the respondents in all Appeals and Mr. Vithaldas S. Bhandari, respondent no.3 in-person in S.A.No.566 of 2011, at length.

2. The question whether Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (for short 'Principal Act') as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 (for short 'Amendment Act') is prospective or retrospective in operation, falls for consideration. Some of the learned counsel submitted that the said section is retrospective in operation while other learned counsel submitted that it is prospective in operation.

3. Mr. Anturkar submitted that the decision rendered by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Vaishali Satish Ganorkar and Ors Vs. Satish Keshavrao Ganorkar and Ors. 2012

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1104

R.G.KETKARAshok Gangadhar Shedge – AppellantVersusRamesh Gangadhar Shedge – Respondent

R.G.KETKAR
Ashok Gangadhar Shedge – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Gangadhar Shedge – Respondent