SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1201

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A.A. SAYED, JJ,
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Through the Municipal Commissioner, having its office at Mahapalika Marg, CST, Mumbai400 001 - Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032. - Respondents
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1135 OF 2014
Decided On : 23 JUNE 2014

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. E.P. Bharucha, Senior Counsel with Mr. S.U. Kamdar, Senior Counsel with Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Counsel with Ms. Komal Punjabi with Ms. Trupti Puranik with Ms. Shobha Ajitkumar i/by Mr. J.J. Xavier for the Petitioner BMC.
Mr. D.G. Khambata, Advocate General, with Ms. Uma Palsuledesai, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Ms. Kiran Bhagalia for Respondent No.7.
Mr. K.K. Malpathak for Respondent No.6.
Mr. V.P. Sawant for MHADA.
Mr. Sardar Baldevsingh Sohansingh Respondent No. 4 present in person.
Mr. Satish Raghunath Patil, Respondent No. 5 present in person.

The duty of the Commissioner to ensure the implementation of notices under Section 354 and the issuance of specific guidelines for the Corporation to address difficulties in evacuating non-cooperative occupants.

Headnote:

Municipal Corporation - Forcible Eviction - Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Section 354

Fact of the Case:

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai filed a petition seeking prayers against the State of Maharashtra and concerned police personnel to take steps for forcible eviction of the occupants of dilapidated and dangerous buildings. The Corporation faced difficulties in implementing notices under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

Finding of the Court:

The court issued guidelines for the forcible eviction of occupants of highly dilapidated and dangerous buildings, emphasizing the need to prevent loss of life and to make Section 354 effective.

Issues: The issues involved the challenges faced by the Corporation in implementing notices under Section 354 and the need for guidelines to address the difficulties in evacuating non-cooperative occupants.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the duty of the Commissioner to ensure the implementation of notices under Section 354 and issued specific guidelines for the Corporation to follow in cases of highly dangerous or dilapidated buildings.

Final Decision: The court issued guidelines for the Corporation to follow in cases of highly dilapidated and dangerous buildings, emphasizing the need to prevent loss of life and to make Section 354 effective.

JUDGMENT

This matter was listed from time to time. We have heard all the Counsel including the Counsel in other matters which were listed along with this matter for their respective suggestions. We have also heard the learned Advocate General and Counsel for MHADA.

2. This Petition has been filed by Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai seeking prayers against the State of Maharashtra and concerned police personnel to take steps for forcible eviction of the occupants of the building known as “Sohansingh Mansion” as also other buildings which are declared to be dilapidated and dangerous by the Corporation and to issue appropriate guidelines for removal of non-cooperating occupants of dilapidated and dangerous buildings. According to the Corporation, these guidelines are necessary so as to avoid any untoward incidents of loss of lives of the occupants of the said buildings, as well as, occupants of the adjoining structures and passersby.

3. Sometimes owners/builders are non-cooperative and fail to take care of their obligations. Sometimes tenants/occupants do not cooperate. Mere initiation of Civil and/or Criminal proceedings for the same is also of no use or effective mechanism to evacuate or evict immediately the non-cooperative tenants/occupants/owners. In view of the urgency expressed, we are inclined to pass the following order based upon the draft of minutes of order prepared and submitted by the Senior Counsel for the Petitioner Corporation and approved by the State Government and MHADA. A copy of the draft of Minutes of Order is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

4. In light of the problem faced by the Corporation concerning large number of seriously dangerous and dilapidated buildings/structures which require to be urgently vacated/demolished, so as to prevent loss of life of the persons residing therein and/or residing in surrounding localities and/or people who are passersby, the Corporation has issued notices under section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”) requiring the occupiers/owners to vacate/pull down the building(s). In view of the fact that in many of such buildings, the tenants and/or occupiers are residing and/or unwilling to vacate the premises inspite of the fact that the building is dilapidated and dangerous and likely to fall, which would cause loss of human life including of the persons who are refusing to vacate therefrom and/or because of the inaction on the part of the owners, it has become necessary to pass the present order.

5. On one hand, a number of petitions are filed and moved by the landlord/owner of such buildings seeking direction that the Corporation must enforce the notices issued by them under Section 354 of the said Act and evacuate/remove the occupiers and demolish the dangerous and dilapidated building(s) after evicting unwilling tenants/occupiers AND on the other hand, a number of petitions are filed by the occupiers and/or tenants of such dangerous and dilapidated buildings seeking to challenge the said notices under Section 354 of the said Act.

6. Section 354 of the said Act reads as under“ Dangerous Structures 354 Removal of structures, etc., which are in ruins or likely to fall.

(1) If it shall at any time appear to the Commissioner that any structure (including under this expression any building, wall or other structure and anything affixed to or projecting from, any building, wall or other structure) is in a ruinous conditions, or likely to fall, or in any way dangerous to any person occupying, resorting to or passing by such structure or any other structure or place in the neighbourhood thereof, the Commissioner may, by written notice, require the owner or occupier of such structure to pull down, secure or repair such structure, subject to the provisions of section 342, and to prevent all cause of danger therefrom.

(2) The Commissioner may also if he thinks fit, require the said owner or occupier, by the































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top