SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1334

A.B.CHAUDHARI
Laxmanrao Mahadeo Nikose – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Mahadeo Nikose – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
H.N. Jaipurkar, Advocate for appellant.
Mr. Zoting, Advocate for respondents.

Judgment

1. Being aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 24.04.1992 passed by Civil Judge Jr. Dn., Saoner, dismissing the suit filed by the appellant-plaintiff and confirmed in Reg. C.A. No.197/1992 passed by 2nd Addl. District Judge, Nagpur on 06.03.2000, the unsuccessful plaintiff had filed the instant second appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant, assailing the impugned judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate Court submitted that the lower appellate court has considered only the point of maintainability of second civil suit holding that the second civil suit in the same subject matter was not maintainable and thus dismissed the appeal preferred by the present appellant. She thus submitted that the lower appellate court did not discuss the single point on merits of the suit and dismissed the appeal on the sole ground. According to her, the lower appellate Court being the court of facts and the said appeal being one of right, the lower appellate court was under a duty to decide the suit on merits. Even otherwise, according to her the second suit was maintainable in the light of law in relation to such type of suits.

2. Per contra, Mr. Zoting learned counsel for the

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top