A.S.OKA, A.S.CHANDURKAR
Vijay Dinkarrao Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.
1) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of parties.
2) The challenge in both these writ petitions is to orders dated 3rd April, 2014 issued by the Additional District Magistrate, Satara directing the petitioners to deposit their licenced weapons with the concerned police station in view of then ensuing elections to the Loksabha in May, 2014. Since similar issue arises in both these writ petitions they are being decided by this common judgment.
3) In Writ Petition No. 4171 of 2014 both the petitioners were issued licence under the Arms Act, 1959. The licences of both the petitioners were subsisting. According to the petitioners, in the first week of April, 2014 they were informed by the police authorities that there was a directive from the office of the Collector for depositing their weapons with the concerned police station. On 3rd April, 2014 a communication was issued by the Additional District Magistrate, Satara respondent No.2 calling upon them to deposit their weapons with the concerned police station. According to the petitioners, they made a representation to the Sub Divisional Officer and Assistant Election Office
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.