R.D.DHANUKA
Minochar @ Minoo Aspandyar Irani – Appellant
Versus
Deenyar Sheriar Jehani – Respondent
1. By this petition filed under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 the petitioner seeks appointment of Court Receiver of the business and assets of the firm of M/s. Leopold Cafe and Stores, 'Cafe New York', 'Cafe Universal', 'Coffee House', ' Leostouch' and 'Leo's Boulangerie' including their bank accounts, licences, trade marks etc. and seeks other interim measures. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this petition are as under :-
2. Sometimes in the year 1975 the petitioner was admitted as a partner in the firm known as M/s. Leopold Cafe and Stores (hereinafter referred to as the suit firm). Respondent nos. 1 to 5 were subsequently introduced to the said firm by the petitioner as partners. The respondent no.6 then a minor was also admitted as a partner by the petitioner. Respondent no.6 became major on 30th September 1997 and continued as a partner of the suit firm. Duration of the suit firm is at Will under the partnership deed. Clause 7 of the deed provides that each partners shall have free access to the books of accounts at all times and shall be at liberty to make such extracts therefrom as may be thought fit by himself or his a
Abani Kumar Mukherjee v. Nand Kishore
Kamal Chaudhary v. Rajendra Chaudhary
Sheonarain Jaiswal v. Shree Kripa Shanker Jaiswal
M/s Sundaram finance Ltd versus/S NEPC India limited AIR 1999 SC 565
Firm Ashok Traders and another versus Gurumukh Das Saluja and others (2004)3 S.C.C 155
State of Tamilnadu versus Shyam Sundar and others AIR 2011 SC 3470
Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jayesh H. Pandya and another AIR 2003 SC 2252
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.