R.P.SONDURBALDOTA
Ganpati Vinayak Achwal – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent
What is the purpose of an heirship certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act? What is the legal effect of a lack of objections after publication of citation for an heirship certificate? Is the right to apply for an heirship certificate a continuous right not barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act?
1. The petitioner had applied for heirship certificate under Rule-2 of the Bombay Regulation Act in respect of his father and his two uncles who had died Bachelors. All the three brothers have left immovable properties at Ambernath, Thane. The death of the father had taken place on 25th September, 1968 and the death of the uncles had taken place on 20th November, 1985 and 13th July, 1990.
2. The application had been filed by the petitioner through his son and Constituted Attorney. As per the prescribed procedure, citation and public notices were issued for calling objections from the public at large. No objection was received from anybody to resist the application. Despite the fact, the trial Court i.e. the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Kalyan rejected the application on two grounds. The first ground was bar of limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act and the second ground was physical incapacity of the petitioner to manage the properties. Being aggrieved by the decision of the trial Court, the petitioner has invoked extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
3. Mr. Badgujar, the learned Advocate for the petit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.