R.V.MORE, U.V.BAKRE
Lithoferro, a partnership firm, Goa represented herein by its Partners – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa, through its Chief Secretary – Respondent
Ranjit More, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent.
2. The above writ petitions pertain to renewal of mining leases. Initially, the petitioners sought directions to the State Government to decide their applications for renewal of the mining leases filed in the year 2007. Some petitions, thereafter, came to be amended, thereby seeking directions to the State Government to execute the second renewal lease deeds. Since the issues raised in these writ petitions are common, and the writ petitions have been analogously heard, the same are being disposed of by this common judgment.
BRIEF BACKGROUND AND FACTS OF THE CASE
2-A. On 19th December, 1961, Goa was liberated and became a part of Indian Union. On 1st October, 1963, the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter, referred to as “the MMDR Act") was made applicable to the Union Territory of Goa. Prior to liberation of Goa, the Portuguese who were ruling Goa had granted mining concessions in perpetuity to the concessionaires. On 10th March, 1975, the Controller of Mining Leases, by issuance of notification, called upon every lessee and sub-lessee to file returns under Rule 5 o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.