SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1671

A.I.S.CHEEMA
Arun – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:A.D. Ostwal, Advocate.
For the Respondent: G.R. Ingole, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT

A.I.S. Cheema, J.

1. Appellant-original accused No. 1 Arun Jagtap (hereinafter referred to as accused), who is in jail was tried along with accused No. 2 Ratan Jagtap and accused No. 3 Rahul Suradkar in Sessions Case No. 148 of 2011 before the Sessions Judge, Jalna for offence under Sections 307, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short). Only the appellant came to be convicted and only under Section 307 of IPC and he has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10 Lakhs and in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years. The Sessions Court directed that, on depositing of fine by the accused or after recovering it, the same be paid to the victim Gangadhar Limbaji Pagare (P.W.2) as compensation under Section 357(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. P.C. for short). Thus, this appeal.

2. The case of prosecution in short is as follows:-

(a) On 26.4.2011, P.W.1 Sanjay Limbaji Pagare, (hereafter referred as complainant) resident of Relgaon, Taluka Bhokardan, brother of victim Gangadhar, filed F.I.R. with Police Station Bhokardan, District Jalna, informing that, on 24.4.2011,


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top