U.V.BAKRE
Gaurav Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Radhika Gupta – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. Rao, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Agni, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.
2. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the interim orders dated 04/10/2012 and 05/10/2012, passed by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Civil Judge Senior Division, Mapusa (Trial Court), in Matrimonial Petition No.20/2009.
3. The petitioner and the respondent are Hindus by religion. They got married to each other on 17/04/1998 according to Hindu Customary Right, in Agra, Uttar Pradesh and the marriage was thereafter registered before the Sub- Registrar at Mapusa on 29/06/1998 under Registration No.664/98. They have two minor daughters from the wedlock, namely Khushi born on 14/02/2001 and Saachi born on 27/03/2004. The petitioner, on or about 24/03/2009, has filed a suit for dissolution of marriage against the petitioner, being Matrimonial Case No.20/2009, under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the Act, for short), which is pending. Initially, the couple and the children stayed in the matrimonial house which is “Anukampa, 60, Green Valley, Alto-Porvorim. Presently, the respondent and her children, have been residing in a three
Neeta Rakesh Jain Vs. Rakesh Jeetmal Jain
Moti Ram (Dead) Through Lrs. and Anr. Vs Ashok Kumar and Anr.
Shalini Shyam Shetty and Anr. Versus Rajendra Shankar Patil
Jai singh and Others Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.
Jasbir Kaur Sehgal (Smt) Vs. District Judge, Dehradun And others
L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India & others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.