SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1159

U.V.BAKRE
Damaciano Fernandes – Appellant
Versus
Anthony's Chapel – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:A.F. Diniz, Advocate.
For the Respondents:C.A. Coutinho, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. Heard Mr. Diniz, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. Coutinho, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. This Second Appeal is directed against the judgment, order and decree dated 07/08/2004, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Margao (First Appellate Court) in Regular Civil Appeal No. 84 of 2002.

3. By the impugned judgment, the judgment, order and decree dated 26/03/2002 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Canacona (Trial Court) in Regular Civil Suit No. 106/1988 (Old Regular Civil Suit No. 142/1986) has been confirmed.

4. The appellant was the defendant and the respondent no. 1 was the plaintiff in the said civil suit. The plaintiff, who claimed to be an unincorporated and unregistered Association, had filed the said suit in representative capacity against the defendant for permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with or constructing any structure in the suit property situated at Mastimola, Canacona, Goa bearing Survey No. 248/37 and also to issue orders to Survey Authorities to delete the name of the defendant from the Survey Records.

5. Case of the plaintiff, in short,












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top