T.V.NALAWADE
Vimal Powerloom – Appellant
Versus
Ravi Agency – Respondent
Rule.
Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for final disposal.
2. The petition is filed to challenge the order of issue process made by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad in S.C.C. No.4177/12. The challenge is made on the ground that the J.M.F.C. has not followed the procedure laid down in section 202 of Criminal Procedure Code (as amended in the year 2006). This Court was taken through copy of complaint which is filed by respondent for offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. This Court was taken through copy of verification of complainant and the order made by J.M.F.C. The order dated 9.10.2012 shows that on the basis of this verification and on the basis of the documents produced by the complainant, the J.M.F.C. made the order of issue process, summons.
3. It was submitted for the accused/petitioner that no inquiry or investigation as required in amended provision of section 202 of Cr.P.C. is made by the J.M.F.C. He relied on some reported cases, which include the case reported as (2013) 2 SCC 488, (National Bank of Oman Vs. Barakara Abdul Aziz). He has relied on some orders made by this Court also in respect of ame
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.