A.B.CHAUDHARI, Z.A.HAQ
Nirbhaysingh s/o. Shamsingh Madkam – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Z.A. Haq, J.
1. Heard Shri C.R.Thakur, Shri R.M.Daga and Shri Abhay Sambre, learned Advocates for the appellants/accused and Shri T. A. Mirza, learned APP for the respondent/State.
2. These appeals arise out of the judgment passed by the learned Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge - 3, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No.22 of 2004 on 27th of February, 2007.
Sessions Case No.22 of 2004 was filed against Twenty Five accused but the sessions trial is conducted against sixteen accused and the remaining nine accused were absconding and therefore, the trial was separated. By the impugned judgment, the learned Sessions Judge has convicted accused No.1 Mira @ Rekha Pawar, accused No.2 -Lakhesingh Dhurve, accused No.3 -Mathawarabai Kumare, accused No.4 - Bijali Dhurve and accused No.12 - Harimishan Madkam for the offence punishable under Section 412 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced them to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years each and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- each and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.
The learned Sessions Judge has convicted accused No.6 -Nirbhaysingh Madkam, accused No.7 -Natwarlal Dhurve, accused No.8 - Ramu
Sheo Shankar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand and anr. AIR 2011 SC 1403
Pramod Mandal vs. State of Bihar (2004) 13 SCC 150
Amar Singh and ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1982 SC 129
Chhote Lal Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 1978 SC 1390
Raj Kishore Singh and ors. vs. The State of Bihar AIR 1971 SC 1058
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.