MRIDULA R.BHATKAR
Prafulla Hedge – Appellant
Versus
Vineeta Vaze – Respondent
This petition challenges the Judgment and order dated 5/5/2012 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Mapsua thereby confirming the order passed by the learned Magistrate issuing process under section 500 against the respondent. It is the case of the respondent that she gave written complaint dated 19/2/2009 to the Inspector General of Police (I.G.P. for short) against the respondent and her husband who owned a company by name 'Rajat International" which is dealing in supply of iron ore and the petitioner is also in the business of export of iron ore. The petitioner has placed the order for some 5000 tonnes of 58% fe and 10,000 tonnes of 53% iron ore and has paid advance of Rs.1.02 crore for supply of the iron ore. However, the company of the respondent did not supply the ore' as per the quality order. The petitioner, therefore, lodged a written complaint with the I.G.P. against the' respondent and her husband for supply of inferior quality ore and cheating the petitioner. Whether pursuant to the said complaint F.I.R was registered or not is not made clear before this Court. However, the statement made in the said written complaint is the ground to lodge the private complai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.